Analytical Rubric to
Assess Historical and Social Science Thinking |
|
- 1
- Incomplete
|
- 2
- In Progress
|
- 3
Fluent
|
4
Exemplary |
Relating
Historical Events, People, Eras |
- does not use comparison and contrast appropriately
- does not draw conclusions
- does not relate past to present
|
- limited use of comparison and contrast
- draws some conclusions
- sometimes relates past to present
|
- uses comparison and contrast appropriately
- draws a conclusion
- relates past to present
|
- demonstrates extensive use of comparison and contrast
- draws insightful conclusions
|
Analyzing Cause and
Effect |
- does not sequence events
- does not tell how events relate
- does not analyze cause and effect
|
- puts few events in a sequence
- tells how some events relate to each other
- analyzes some causes and effects
|
- puts events in a sequence
- tells how events relate to each other
- analyzes multiple causes and effects
|
- shows extensive understanding of relationships
- provides insight into cause and effect
|
Using Multiple
Perspectives |
- does not examine issues from other points of view
- does not analyze, summarize, and compare views
|
- examines some issues from other points of view
- analyzes, summarizes, and compares few different points of view
|
- examines issues from other points of view
- analyzes, summarizes, and compares different points of view
|
- demonstrates a clear and extensive understanding of multiple
perspectives
|
Defending a Position |
- cannot take a point of view
- does not form logical arguments
- does not support arguments with evidence
- does not show knowledge of other points of view
|
- researches a topic and arrives at a limited interpretation
- forms some logical arguments
- supports arguments with limited evidence
- shows some knowledge of other points of view
|
- researches a topic and arrives at an interpretation
- can take a point of view
- forms a logical argument
- supports arguments with evidence
- shows knowledge of other points of view
|
- conducts extensive research
- arguments or statements are supported with ample fact and detail
- clearly understands all points of view
|
Interpreting Data |
- cannot put data in own words, or explain meaning
- cannot relate data to context
- does not evaluate reliability of data
- does not interpret data
- does not use appropriate tools for interpretation
|
- can put some data in own words
- can relate data to a limited context
- limited evaluation of reliability of data
- forms limited interpretation of the data
- uses some tools for interpretation
|
- can put data in own words, explains meaning
- can relate data to context
- evaluates reliability of data
- forms an interpretation of data
- uses appropriate tools for interpretation
|
- can clearly relate data to its context and other contexts
- interprets data in an insightful manner
- extensively uses graphs, charts, etc., to interpret and analyze
data
|
Analytical rubric developed by Heidi
Dettwiller from California Department of Education materials |